How New U.S. Shipping Fees on Chinese Vessels Could Disrupt Global Trade & Supply Chains

In February 2025, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) proposed significant fees on Chinese-operated and Chinese-built ships entering American ports. This policy aims to reduce reliance on Chinese maritime services, encourage domestic shipbuilding, and strengthen national security. However, the proposal could have far-reaching consequences for global trade, shipping companies, and consumers. This article explores the details of the proposal, its potential impacts, and the broader implications for the shipping industry.

Understanding the Proposed Shipping Fees

The USTR’s proposal introduces several fees targeting Chinese vessels and shipbuilding:

• Chinese-operated vessels: Up to $1 million per port visit or $1,000 per ton of cargo capacity.
• Chinese-built ships: Even if operated by non-Chinese companies, these vessels could face fees of up to $1.5 million per port entry.
• Operators with pending Chinese shipyard orders: Additional fees ranging from $500,000 to $1 million per port call, depending on the percentage of Chinese-built vessels in their fleet.

To incentivize domestic shipbuilding, the policy offers refunds of up to $1 million per port call for operators using U.S.-built ships. However, with only a limited number of U.S.-built vessels currently in operation, the immediate impact of this incentive may be minimal.

Financial Implications for Shipping Companies

The proposed fees could significantly impact shipping companies’ profit margins. Container ships typically generate $10 million to $15 million in revenue per voyage, depending on the size of the vessel, the type of cargo, and the route. For example, a large container ship carrying electronics and consumer goods from Asia to the U.S. West Coast might earn around $12 million per trip. With fees potentially exceeding $3 million per voyage (considering multiple U.S. port calls), companies may need to adjust their operations to minimize costs. This could include rerouting shipments through Canadian or Mexican ports, which may increase transit times and logistical complexity.

Shipping Industry Profits in 2024

The global container shipping industry experienced record profitability in 2024. In the second quarter alone, net income exceeded $10 billion, driven by high freight rates and record cargo volumes. Here’s a closer look at the performance of the top five shipping carriers:

1. A.P. Moller-Maersk: The Danish shipping giant reported a 15% increase in quarterly profits compared to 2023, driven by strong demand for transatlantic routes.
2. Cosco Shipping Holdings: China’s largest shipping company achieved a 20% rise in revenue, reflecting its dominance in global shipping and its extensive fleet of Chinese-built vessels.
3. Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC): The Swiss-based carrier saw a 12% increase in profits, thanks to its focus on expanding its fleet and optimizing routes.
4. CMA CGM: The French shipping company reported a 10% rise in revenue, driven by its investments in logistics and port infrastructure.
5. Hapag-Lloyd: The German carrier experienced an 8% increase in profits, supported by its focus on high-value cargo and efficient operations.

Despite these gains, the proposed U.S. fees could erode future profitability, especially for companies heavily reliant on Chinese-built vessels.

Implementation Timeline

The USTR is currently seeking public comments on the proposal, with a deadline of March 24, 2025. While an exact implementation date has not been set, the policy could take effect shortly after the review period concludes. Businesses involved in international trade should monitor developments closely to prepare for potential changes. Public comments can be submitted through the USTR’s official website, and stakeholders are encouraged to share their perspectives on the proposal’s potential impacts.

Pros of the Proposed Policy

· Revitalization of Domestic Shipbuilding: The fees could encourage investment in U.S. shipyards, creating jobs and fostering innovation in the maritime sector.

· Enhanced National Security: Reducing dependence on foreign-built vessels strengthens control over critical maritime infrastructure.

· Diversification of Supply Chains: Encouraging companies to explore alternative sourcing and shipping options could lead to more resilient supply chains.

· Support for U.S. Ports: Ports handling U.S.-built ships may see increased traffic, boosting local economies.

· Long-Term Economic Growth: Over time, the policy could lead to a resurgence in U.S. shipbuilding, reducing reliance on foreign suppliers and creating a more self-sufficient maritime industry.

Cons of the Proposed Policy

· Higher Costs for Importers and Consumers: Shipping companies are likely to pass on the additional fees to importers, leading to higher prices for goods.

· Potential Retaliation from China: The policy could provoke retaliatory measures, such as tariffs on U.S. exports, impacting industries like agriculture and manufacturing.

· Strain on Smaller U.S. Ports: Ports with less traffic may suffer if shipping companies reroute to avoid fees, potentially causing economic downturns in those regions.

· Supply Chain Disruptions: Rerouting shipments through alternative ports could increase transit times and logistical challenges.

· Short-Term Economic Impact: The immediate costs of the policy could outweigh the long-term benefits, especially for industries reliant on affordable shipping.

Historical Context of U.S. Trade Policies

The U.S. has a history of implementing protectionist trade policies to support domestic industries. For example, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods. While it aimed to protect American businesses during the Great Depression, it led to international retaliations and a significant contraction in global trade. Similarly, the proposed shipping fees could have unintended consequences for global commerce, especially if other countries respond with their own tariffs or restrictions.

Long-Term Benefits of the Policy

· Strengthened Domestic Industry: Over time, the policy could lead to a resurgence in U.S. shipbuilding, reducing reliance on foreign suppliers.

· Improved Maritime Infrastructure: Increased investment in U.S. ports and shipyards could modernize the country’s maritime capabilities.

· Economic Growth: Job creation in shipbuilding and related industries could boost local economies.

· Strategic Advantage: By reducing dependence on Chinese-built vessels, the U.S. could gain greater control over its maritime supply chains, enhancing national security.

· Global Leadership: The policy could position the U.S. as a leader in sustainable and innovative shipbuilding, attracting international investment and partnerships.

Final Thoughts & Next Steps

The USTR’s proposed fees on Chinese-operated and Chinese-built vessels mark a significant shift in U.S. trade policy, with potential ripple effects across the global supply chain. While the goal is to strengthen domestic shipbuilding and enhance national security, businesses must prepare for potential cost increases, supply chain adjustments, and evolving trade routes. Staying informed and proactive is key to minimizing disruptions and optimizing logistics strategies.

At Southern Star Navigation, we’re closely monitoring these developments and helping our clients navigate the changing shipping landscape. If you have questions about how these changes might affect your business or need expert guidance on alternative solutions, give us a call at 833-782-7628 Ext. 1.

For more logistics insights and industry updates, follow us Bethany 🌎 Gabbett and subscribe to our newsletter. Stay ahead of the curve and ensure your business is ready for what’s next!

Public comments are open until March 24, 2025, and businesses are encouraged to participate in shaping the final policy.

Sources

1. WorldCargo News – U.S. Moves to Impose Fees on Chinese Ships
2. Reuters – USTR Proposes Charging Chinese Ships
3. USTR Official Website – Public Comment Submission

Disclaimer: Verification of Revenue Figures

The claim that container ships typically generate $10 million to $15 million in revenue per voyage is based on industry averages for large vessels operating on major trade routes. For example, a 10,000 TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) container ship on the Asia-to-North America route can earn between $10 million and $15 million per voyage, depending on freight rates and cargo volume. This figure aligns with data from industry reports and shipping company financial statements. However, smaller vessels or those operating on less profitable routes may earn less. Revenue can vary significantly based on market conditions and operational factors.